Some checks are pending
Bidi Control Character Guard / bidi-control-guard (push) Waiting to run
Circular Dependency Check / Check for new circular dependencies (push) Waiting to run
Citus Migration Smoke / Combined migrations on single-node Citus (push) Waiting to run
E2E Fresh Install Tests / fresh-install-e2e (push) Waiting to run
ext-v2 guardrails / Run ext-v2 guard and ESLint (push) Waiting to run
Integration Tests / Check for relevant changes (push) Waiting to run
Integration Tests / ${{ (github.event_name == 'schedule' || github.event.inputs.suite == 'full') && 'Full integration suite' || 'Tier-1 integration subset' }} (push) Blocked by required conditions
Mobile checks / Mobile lint + typecheck (push) Waiting to run
Mobile checks / Mobile unit tests (push) Waiting to run
Mobile checks / Mobile dependency audit (report) (push) Waiting to run
Mobile checks / Mobile reproducibility checks (push) Waiting to run
Secrets guard (env backups) / Ensure no tracked env backup files (push) Waiting to run
Temporal Readiness / fast-readiness (push) Waiting to run
Temporal Readiness / docker-parity (push) Waiting to run
TypeScript Type Check / Nx affected typecheck (push) Waiting to run
Unit Tests / Skipped-test budget (push) Waiting to run
Unit Tests / Nx affected unit tests (push) Waiting to run
Unit Tests / Server unit coverage (informational) (push) Waiting to run
Validate Tenant Management Schema / Check for relevant changes (push) Waiting to run
Validate Tenant Management Schema / Validate Tenant Management Schema (push) Blocked by required conditions
EE Workflows Build Guard / ee-workflows-build-guard (push) Waiting to run
Excluded: .git, node_modules, secrets/, compose.env, assemblyscript tgz Source: /opt/alga-psa on psa.joliet.tech
6.5 KiB
6.5 KiB
PRD — Inbound Email Reopen On Reply
- Slug:
inbound-email-reopen-on-reply - Date:
2026-03-31 - Status: Draft
Summary
Add per-board inbound-email reopen policies for replies against closed tickets. Match ConnectWise-style behavior by allowing boards to opt into reopen-on-reply, configure a cutoff window, and choose a reopen status. Add optional Enterprise Edition AI suppression for short client acknowledgements when the tenant has the AI Assistant add-on.
Problem
Inbound email threading already finds existing tickets and appends comments, but replies against closed tickets do not have a clear lifecycle policy. This creates ambiguity for technicians and customers, especially when a legitimate follow-up should resume work but a trivial "thanks" should not reopen a finished ticket.
Goals
- Reopen closed tickets automatically for valid inbound replies using board-scoped policy.
- Support a configurable cutoff window so old replies create a new ticket instead of reviving stale work.
- Let boards configure an explicit reopen status while falling back to the board's default open status.
- Always reopen for internal-user email replies.
- Optionally suppress reopen for short client acknowledgements using the standard LLM path when EE +
AI Assistantare available. - Keep inbound processing resilient and non-blocking when AI or configuration is unavailable.
Non-goals
- Building a general-purpose AI classifier infrastructure.
- Restoring the exact historical pre-closure status.
- Making reopen policy provider-scoped or tenant-wide.
- Adding new workflow automation surfaces for this v1.
- Building advanced analytics or reporting for reopen decisions.
Users and Primary Flows
- MSP technicians:
- Need closed tickets to reopen automatically when internal discussion or new customer work resumes.
- Need stale replies to become new work instead of mutating old tickets.
- MSP admins:
- Need board-specific control over reopen policy, cutoff, reopen status, and AI suppression opt-out.
- Client contacts:
- Their substantive replies should reopen active work.
- Their simple acknowledgements should optionally remain attached without reopening when the board enables AI suppression.
Primary flows:
- Internal user replies by email to a closed ticket within cutoff -> ticket reopens -> reply comment is added.
- Client replies by email to a closed ticket within cutoff -> ticket reopens unless AI suppression classifies the reply as a simple acknowledgement.
- Any threaded reply to a closed ticket after cutoff -> old ticket remains closed -> inbound flow creates a new ticket.
UX / UI Notes
- Add reopen policy controls to board settings because ticket statuses are board-owned.
- Expose AI acknowledgement suppression as a visible board option so admins know the feature exists and can opt out.
- Reopen status picker should use board-owned ticket statuses.
- If AI suppression is unavailable because the tenant lacks
AI Assistant, the setting should either be disabled with explanatory copy or treated as inactive at runtime.
Requirements
Functional Requirements
- Board settings must persist reopen-on-inbound-reply configuration:
- enable/disable
- cutoff duration
- optional reopen status
- AI acknowledgement suppression enable/disable
- When inbound threading matches an existing closed ticket:
- if reopen is disabled, attach the comment without reopening
- if reply age exceeds cutoff, route into new-ticket creation instead of attaching to the closed ticket
- if sender is internal, reopen
- if sender is client/contact, reopen unless AI suppression is enabled and returns
ACK
- Reopen must update
status_id,is_closed,closed_at, andclosed_byconsistently with existing ticket status transition semantics. - If no explicit reopen status is configured, fallback must use the board's default open status.
- Existing dedupe and token-only self-notification guards must remain intact.
- The AI acknowledgement decision path must be isolated behind a shared interface with an EE implementation injected in EE mode.
- The EE implementation must only call AI when:
- board AI suppression is enabled
- tenant has
AI Assistant - reply is short and plausibly acknowledgement-like
- AI prompt/output must be minimal and return a tiny formatted response such as
ACKorNOT_ACK.
Non-functional Requirements
- Inbound email processing must not fail closed because of missing AI entitlement, missing EE code, invalid AI output, or AI runtime errors.
- Fallback behavior for AI failures is reopen normally.
- Logging or stored metadata must be sufficient to explain reopen decisions during debugging.
Data / API / Integrations
- Add board-scoped configuration fields for reopen policy and AI suppression.
- Reuse existing board-owned status selection and
TicketModel.getDefaultStatusId(...). - Reuse existing inbound threading flow in
shared/services/email/processInboundEmailInApp.ts. - Reuse existing AI provider resolution pattern in EE code via
@ee/.... - AI suppression uses the existing
AI Assistantadd-on entitlement (ai_assistant).
Security / Permissions
- Board reopen policy editing follows existing board-settings permissions.
- AI suppression execution must require the tenant
AI Assistantadd-on before any LLM call. - CE environments must not import or require EE AI code paths at runtime.
Observability
- Log or persist decision metadata for:
- reopen enabled/disabled
- cutoff exceeded
- reopen target source (explicit status vs board default)
- AI suppression attempted / skipped / failed
- AI result (
ACK/NOT_ACK)
Rollout / Migration
- Default existing boards to reopen disabled so behavior does not change silently.
- New board settings become active only when configured by admins.
- AI suppression is dormant unless both board config and add-on entitlement are present.
Open Questions
- None blocking design. Future optimization work may replace the standard LLM call with a narrower classifier or heuristic layer once production examples are available.
Acceptance Criteria (Definition of Done)
- Boards can configure reopen-on-inbound-reply behavior, cutoff window, optional reopen status, and AI suppression.
- Closed-ticket inbound replies follow the configured policy for internal and client senders.
- Replies beyond cutoff create new tickets instead of reopening stale ones.
- AI suppression only runs in EE with
AI Assistantentitlement and falls back safely on any failure. - Behavioral integration coverage proves reopen, no-reopen, cutoff, and fallback outcomes.